Skip to main contentScroll Top

The Transgender Persons (Amendment) Act 2026 and the I.R. Coelho Doctrine: Can the Parliament Overrule the Supreme Court?

The Transgender Persons (Amendment) Act 2026 and the I.R. Coelho Doctrine: Can the Parliament Overrule the Supreme Court?

Author's Details -

Sritha M (Jindal Global Law School, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India)

Received 25 May 2026; Accepted 25 June 2026; Published 29 June 2026

Cite this Paper: Sritha M, 'The Transgender Persons (Amendment) Act 2026 and the I.R. Coelho Doctrine: Can the Parliament Overrule the Supreme Court?' (2026) 6(4) Jus Corpus Law Journal 84-92 <https://doi.org/10.66918/juscorpus.v6i4.2026.23>

Category: Short Article

Pagination: 84-92

While Artificial Intelligence was always known as being quite recent technology, the undeniable truth about artificial intelligence is that it is already being used in administration and governance in today’s world. Algorithms are utilised in various administrative tasks such as recruitment procedures, social security, credit ratings, policing, health care, data analysis, and much more. Although algorithms work in an objective manner, the problem with algorithms is that it is one of the entities that discriminate against people based on certain traits. The use of an algorithm is a discriminatory action that constitutes a violation of the Constitution, as it discriminates against a person without knowing them. Some issues have arisen in connection with the use of artificial intelligence within the process of administration in India regarding Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which refers to equality of treatment. Previously, there was no interference at all from anyone with the activities conducted by people, as well as the government. But once an algorithm is used, there is a connection between the two. In this work, it will be analysed how algorithmic discrimination may be linked with Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. First, it will be mentioned what the evolution of equality legislation is, what problems arise from using artificial intelligence for decisionmaking processes, and what examples can be used as comparative practices because of regulatory algorithms elsewhere. Then, it will be concluded that it is required to have appropriate algorithmic governance because of the Indian Constitution. At the same time, although artificial intelligence cannot acquire the legal person status, there is a chance of becoming unconstitutional because of biased algorithms.
Paper Type Journal Info Creative Commons Copyright

Short Article

Jus Corpus Law Journal

Vol 6 Issue 4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Jus Corpus Law Journal 2026

All rights reserved.