Skip to main contentScroll Top

Case Comment: Javed Ahmed Hajam v State of Maharashtra: Dissent, Democracy, and the Limits of Section 153A

Case Comment: Javed Ahmed Hajam v State of Maharashtra: Dissent, Democracy, and the Limits of Section 153A

Author's Details -

Idhayaveena M (Tamil Nadu National Law University, Trichy, India)

Received 22 May 2026; Accepted 22 June 2026; Published 26 June 2026

Cite this Paper: Idhayaveena M, 'Case Comment: Javed Ahmed Hajam v State of Maharashtra: Dissent, Democracy, and the Limits of Section 153A' (2026) 6(4) Jus Corpus Law Journal 29-34 <https://doi.org/10.66918/juscorpus.v6i4.2026.20>

Category: Case Comment

Pagination: 29-34

The right to freedom of speech and expression, under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, forms the bedrock of a functioning democracy. It is not merely a civil liberty but a political necessity without the freedom to criticise, question, and dissent, democratic governance loses its very legitimacy. However, this right has never been absolute. Article 19(2) permits the State to impose reasonable restrictions in the interests of public order, sovereignty and integrity of India, and other specified grounds. The challenge for the judiciary, therefore, lies not in acknowledging the existence of these restrictions but in ensuring that they are not weaponised to silence voices that are merely inconvenient to those in power.
Paper Type Journal Info Creative Commons Copyright

Case Comment

Jus Corpus Law Journal

Vol 6 Issue 4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Jus Corpus Law Journal 2026

All rights reserved.