Scroll Top


The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019 was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 19, 2019 by Mr. Thaawarchand Gehlot, the minister of social justice and empowerment.


The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019 was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 19, 2019 by Mr. Thaawarchand Gehlot, the minister of social justice and empowerment. The Bill was introduced to stop discrimination against transgender persons. Such discrimination includes denial of service or unfair treatment in reference to education, employment, healthcare, access to, or enjoyment of products, facilities, opportunities available to the general public, right to movement, right to reside, rent, or otherwise occupy property, opportunity to carry public or private office and access to a government or private establishment in whose care or custody a transgender person is. The bill recognizes forced or bondage, denial of sor mental, as offences.

Penalties for these offences vary between six months and two years, and a fine. A council named National Council for Transgender persons (NCT) was also setup. The Council will advise the central government also as monitor the impact of policies, legislation and projects with reference to the interests of transgender persons. It’ll also affect the grievances of transgender persons.

However, most of the people weren’t proud of the provisions of the act. The act fails the community on various grounds. a number of them area) Several definitions that the Transgender Persons Bill endorses are fairly excess on the problems of the network. Specifically, the meaning of family. Where the present demonstration gets its definition aimlessly from prior laws found out, with no use of psyche on the position or the subtleties related with the transsexual network. Such a worn-out meaning of ‘family’ is after various explanations made by individuals from the network concerning the necessity to grow the importance of ‘family’. With most transgender not living with their organic family in sight of the segregation and savagery they face from their natural family and their quick network. During this way, a requirement to include picked family inside the ambit and meaning of ‘family’. Since it’s through the picked family that the majority transgender get uphold and may discover their friends and relatives.

  1. b) Though there’s a special definition for ‘intersex people’, it appears to possess been never really assuage universal gatherings engaging for a special definition for intersex people. Since within the following line it’s been conflated alongside the definition for ‘transsexual individual. This is not only an alarming distortion yet additionally an invisibilisation of intersex people and their interests. This is often of outrageous significance within the part of wellbeing as there’s a scope of particular issues that intersex people face. Extending from constrained ‘remedial’ procedure on intersex new-born children to proceeding with medical problems which the clinical framework is both unequipped to affect and is inaccessible to countless intersex people.
  2. c) The Chapter that forbids separation covers victimization transsexual people on scope of fronts. It isn’t so much as an innocuous tiger; it is only various teeth dispersed about with no force, reason or power to make a move all alone. The part denying segregation is tormented with three significant concerns:
  3. i) Lack of an implementing authority
  4. ii) Lack of therapeutic measures, be it regarding remuneration or some other methods, for the survivor

iii) Lack of corrective measures to be taken against the violator

  1. d) The cycle of acknowledgment of personality of transgender is influenced by similar issues with the prior Bill. In spite of the fact that the District Screening Committee has been destroyed, acknowledgment of a transsexual individual’s character is then to be chosen by the District

Magistrate, who will at that point issue the authentication dependent on a specific arrangement of archives that, would be endorsed. The essential inquiry that emerges is then concerning what are the records that would permit transsexual people to be perceived with respect to their way of life as a transsexual individual. These follow on with another arrangement of issues that obfuscate how sex personality is to be chosen:

  1. I) If an individual is to then change their favored sexual orientation to male or female, the

Transgender Persons Bill beholds back to the bygone comprehension, authorizing the requirement for a Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS) so as to change their sex personality to their favored sex of either male or female. Additionally, the legitimacy of the SRS would be chosen by the District Magistrate.

  1. ii) Post the adjustment in sex character, the individual is then permitted to just change their first name, which brings up the issue concerning the holy position that the last name holds with the end goal that under no situation at that point can the individual be supported in changing their last name. The sole purpose behind such an impediment of changing one’s last name is the impenetrable idea of standing in Indian culture. Consequently, keeping one from changing one’s last name is the essential way through which position framework and the progressive system holds its hardened state.
  2. e) ‘Commitments by the proper government’ experiences similar issues as the section on avoidance of segregation. The absence of any sort of corrective activity against the state, or assets allocated for such plans, essentially brings up issues on the adequacy of such arrangements.
  3. f) The proviso of ‘salvage, insurance and restoration’ must be perused in setting of the experience of transgender in salvage/cover homes. The measure of misuse, of different structures—mental, physical, passionate and sexual, looked by transgender has had the network being amazingly fearful about the way in which haven homes are set up and run. Also, from prior encounters cover homes have shown a clear obtuseness toward worries of transsexual people. For quite a long time, we have stayed and lived autonomously with help from the network, in the midst of the segregation and savagery. We needn’t bother with a superfluous policing of our reality by the state. Try not to limit our lives, we need insurance systems from the individuals who keen on disregarding our personalities, bodies and lives.
  4. g) The Transgender Persons Bill specifies a grievance official assigned to manage objections under this law. The way toward having a grumbling official is totally muddled, it could be through assignment, political race or some other cycle, yet starting at now, the way toward having the protest official is non-existent. The method concluded will build up the autonomy and the adequacy of the protest official and its nonappearance, the condition is a reason for concern.
  5. h) The limitation of development as to transgender in isolating from their folks and permitting an individual to move out just through a request for ‘a skilful court’. Isolating the network on class lines with just those having the option to get to court in any event, getting an opportunity at isolating from their family. Moving out of the family has been the need of an enormous number of transgender, fundamentally because of the separation and savagery they would look from their close family and the prompt encompassing network. The opportunity to move and have a picked family has been adequately confined and disassembled through this statement. Moreover, the main option made accessible to the network other than the family is a recovery place, the mistakes and fears of which have been emphasized on numerous occasions.

These are a few problems, among many others, with the transgender person’s bill, 2019. The previous bills which were introduced for transgender community had many flaws and the same is true for this act too. We are moving forward but still stuck at the same place. It is quite disappointing to see that even in the 21st century, we are struggling to provide the basic rights which they need to live a peaceful life. This bill promised to change the lives of community but still need to be dealt with. One can only hope that these concerns are taken care of in the near future and hope for the best.

Author(s) Name: Aditya Tiwari  (The ICFAI University, Dehradun)