Skip to main contentScroll Top

The Doctrine of Estoppel and Its Exceptions under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023: Continuity, Change and Critical Reflections

The Doctrine of Estoppel and Its Exceptions under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023: Continuity, Change and Critical Reflections

Author's Details -

Sanya Daryani (National Law Institute University, Bhopal, India)

Received 30 July 2026; Accepted 01 September 2026; Published 05 September 2026

Cite this Paper: Sanya Daryani, 'The Doctrine of Estoppel and Its Exceptions under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023: Continuity, Change and Critical Reflections' (2026) 7(1) Jus Corpus Law Journal 41-51 <https://doi.org/10.66918/juscorpus.v7i1.2026.03>

Category: Short Article

Pagination: 41-51

The doctrine of estoppel prevents a person from denying a representation of fact that he has intentionally caused another to believe and act upon. Codified in Sections 121 to 123 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), the principle largely continues the scheme of the repealed Indian Evidence Act, 1872 while introducing a significant temporal expansion in the tenant-estoppel rule. This long article undertakes a comprehensive examination of the conceptual foundations of estoppel in English and Indian law, the precise statutory language and policy of the new Code, the eight essential ingredients crystallised by the Supreme Court, the operation of the special estoppels applicable to tenants, licensees, bailees and acceptors of bills of exchange, and the principal exceptions recognised in Indian jurisprudence. Particular attention is devoted to the distinction between statutory estoppel by representation and the equitable doctrines of promissory and proprietary estoppel, the interaction of estoppel with public policy, statutory rights and governmental action, and the continuing relevance of pre-BSA authority. The article argues that while the BSA preserves valuable doctrinal continuity and usefully strengthens the position of landlords, the continued absence of an express statutory recognition of promissory estoppel leaves an important gap that Indian courts have been compelled to fill through judicial creativity. The paper concludes with concrete suggestions for legislative clarification, for a disciplined application of the statutory ingredients, and for the adaptation of the doctrine to contemporary commercial and digital contexts.
Paper Type Journal Info Creative Commons Copyright

Short Article

Jus Corpus Law Journal

Vol 6 Issue 4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Jus Corpus Law Journal 2026

All rights reserved.