Skip to main contentScroll Top

Skill v Chance: Online Gambling and Gaming Laws in India

Skill v Chance: Online Gambling and Gaming Laws in India

Author's Details -

Abhilash Obalannavar (Assistant Professor, DBHP Sabha’s Shri P V Joshi Law College, Dharwad, India)
Sneha Kadrolli (Assistant Professor, DBHP Sabha’s Shri P V Joshi Law College, Dharwad, India)

Received 06 July 2026; Accepted 07 August 2026; Published 11 August 2026

Cite this Paper: Abhilash Obalannavar & Sneha Kadrolli, 'Skill v Chance: Online Gambling and Gaming Laws in India' (2026) 6(4) Jus Corpus Law Journal 314-322 <https://doi.org/10.66918/juscorpus.v6i4.2026.71>

Category: Short Article

Pagination: 314-322

Rapid escalation of online gaming platforms in India, especially those involving real-money mechanisms, such as fantasy sports, rummy, and poker, has rekindled long-standing debates between games of skill and games of chance. The article critically analyses the intricate and complex regulatory pathways for online gambling and gaming in India, emphasising the urgent need for clear doctrinal guidelines and legislative uniformity. Gambling regulation remains considerably fragmented, arising from Article 246 and Entry 34 of the State List, with gamesters being banned in one state and licensed in another. Such divergence has given rise to a jumble of laws, clashing time and again with mounting judicial interpretations. Discussed in the article are the theoretical and judicial outcomes, such as the Predominance Test and Format & Intent Test, to determine game types and landmark judgments delivered by the Supreme Court and High Courts in cases like Dr K.R. Lakshmanan, Varun Gumber, and D. Siluvai Venance. With the advent of digital platforms, regulatory oversight has been simplified, but the emerging challenges are in taxation, addiction, and accessing money laundering through offshore and even crypto-enabled routes by minors. With a vision of a more centralised regulatory framework led by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) through its online gaming intermediary guidelines, an interesting juncture is unfolding. Lastly, the article discusses how a common national law framework ought to separate skill-based gaming from chance-based gaming, thus trying to make the balancing act between economic innovation and public welfare. This legal framework should, first and foremost, provide clarity on the law, protect consumers, and manage technological change, which all together synchronise with India’s digital economy ambition.
Paper Type Journal Info Creative Commons Copyright

Short Article

Jus Corpus Law Journal

Vol 6 Issue 4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© Jus Corpus Law Journal 2026

All rights reserved.