Scroll Top


Farmers Protest


 “No race can prosper until it learns there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem.” — Booker T. Washington.

We need to perceive that everybody serves a significant role in society. From farmers to head of the state, all are equally important.

The NDA government passed three Bills — the first one the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, the second one Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, and the last one Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill 2020; these bills are referred to as Indian Agro reforms 2020. There is widespread farmers’ protest happening against these three new agrarian bills. The central government said that these agricultural reforms would boost the growth of the agricultural sector through private investment in building infrastructure and strengthen the supply chain for agricultural produce. 


The bill proposes to make a structure where the peasants and traders can offer their farm produce to end purchasers just as institutional customers outside the Mandis (i.e., There are arrangements that empower the farmers to sell their produce outside the state too.)

The missing part in this current framework is that the farmers had been confronting some issues since the late 18th century. These issues incorporated overproduction, low yield costs, high transportation costs, high-loan fees, and growing obligations. Farmers attempted to lighten these issues but failed. Other than this there is significant objection with the current MSP-based acquirement framework is the working reliance on brokers, middleman, and redundancy of the APMC authorities; they think that it is hard to gain admittance to these APMCs and relies upon the market to sell their farm yield.

Under the current system, each state does a duty to acquire agricultural produce from a devoted Agricultural produce market committee (APMC) Market. The toll could go from 2% to 14%, shifting from state to state. The ranch charges, in actuality, relieve the equivalent if the exchanges are directed externally to the APMC market. Aside from the above duties, the farmers can escape from the threat of the brokers and middlemen who are known as “arhatiyas” who charge an expense on the obtainment exchanges led through them. 

The bills additionally target advancing, creating great yields according to the concurred course of action between the farmers and the procurer, which could prompt a flood in natural cultivating. Such a move could prompt a steady interest in biopesticides rather than synthetic-based pesticides.

The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020

 The peasants and dealers will encounter the opportunity of an alternative method to trade farm yield. This bill empowers hindrance free trade all over India beyond the actual limits of business sectors. The transportation cost and other cesses which can be imposed on the purchase of agricultural products will not need to pay by the farmers. A proposal for an e-exchanging stage for guaranteeing a consistent exchange automatically also has been prepared. The producer will have the option to do the exchange at any place like farm gate, mandis, cold stockpiling, stockroom, and so forth. Producers will have the option of selling their produce directly, taking out middle people bringing about the acknowledgment of greater prices.

The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020

This bill will strengthen the farmers to do business directly with the wholesalers, aggregators, huge retailers, exporters. Value confirmation will be offered to the peasants before the harvesting of their produce. On account of costs offered higher in the market, farmers will be qualified for this profitable value much over the minimum cost. It will move the danger of market eccentrics from the farmer to the monetarily incredible support. Due to earlier value assurance, farmers will be protected from the instability of market prices. It will offer admittance to the farmer to embrace present-day innovation, better seed, and different info sources. It will moderate the expense of advertising and upgrade the pay of farmers. A viable dispute resolution mechanism has been encouraged with unmistakable timetables for redressal. Government backing to farmers for assimilating examination and innovation to make advance in the slacking horticulture area. 

Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020

It was proclaimed on June 5, 2020. The Act engages the government to control the production, supply, dissemination, exchange, and trade of specific products. The Ordinance looks to expand rivalry in the horticulture area and improve farmers’ pay. It intends to change the administrative framework while securing the interests of consumers. As per the Procurement Policy, the Food Corporation of India would keep on working as in the past and purchase food grains from the producers at the MSP.PDS or apportion shops also would work before appropriating the food grains to the majority at sponsored costs. Be that as it may, talks are going on in the public authority to lift food endowments. 


After the acts were introduced in the parliament, farmers and local unions started holding protests at the district level, mostly in the states of Punjab and Haryana. Punjab procures Rs 3500 to Rs 3600 Crores yearly as a market expense and rural advancement fund, which currently remains in danger. Arhatiyas (middleman) likewise remain to lose a decent piece of their pay as the reliance on the delegates would drop generously clearing the route for a more open and available market for the farmers. It is additionally accepted that these changes may prompt “corporatization” of the agrarian business sectors, which may lead to the concealment of farmers and give an excessively favorable position to partnerships. Following two months of protests, farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, started a movement named Delhi Chalo.


Art 256 of the constitution of India accommodates the commitment of States and the Union.

“It States that the executive power of every State shall be so exercised as to ensure compliance with the laws made by Parliament and any existing laws which apply in that State, and the executive power of the Union shall extend to the giving of such directions to a State as may appear to the Government of India to be necessary for that purpose.”

Hence, under article 256 of the Indian constitution, states are in commitment to implement the laws outlined by the Union government. 

“Article 131 gives a selective purview of the Supreme Court in disputes involving States, or the Centre on the one hand and one or more States on the other, the Center from one viewpoint and at least one States on the other.”

In 2011, in the State of M.P. v UOI, the court stated that the Central laws could be tested in the State High Courts and Supreme Court under Article 32 and held that the established legitimacy of a Central law couldn’t be ordinarily challenged under Article 131. But, in 2014, in the case of State of Jharkhand v. State of Bihar, the SC upheld Article 131 as a fitting device to test the lawfulness of Central law. The court decided that the condition for invoking the court’s jurisdiction under Article 131 was that the debate ought to include an inquiry on the presence or degree of a legal right and not a political one.

Therefore, as of now, the States can move to the Supreme Court under Article 131 if any lawful right got from any statute or the Constitution encroached. Further states cannot scrutinize the lawfulness of central law on a political or ideological premise.


 The least complex solution against the dissent of the farmers concerning Agro reforms bills can be including statutory backing to MSP and obtainment in the new Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices. The government proclaims MSPs for crops. However, there are no lawful ramifications. The public authority can obtain at the MSPs on the off chance that it needs to along these lines the arrangement of MSP will remain, and government acquisition will proceed, this dread must be explained considerably further, and farmers should be correctly led in such manner.

Author(s) Name: Shivendra Nath Mishra (Chanakya National Law University, Patna)